Developer platform WorkOS suffered a data breach after a threat actor accessed business contact records and summaries of customer communications. According to the company, the attacker used an AI offensive security framework to automate reconnaissance and exploitation attempts. Based on evidence from the investigation, no WorkOS app data or production services were accessed or affected. WorkOS is a developer infrastructure company that provides APIs, SDKs, and tools for integrating services such as enterprise authentication, single sign-on (SSO), user management, and identity management into applications. According to its website, at least 3,000 companies use its services, including OpenAI, Anthropic, Cursor, Perplexity, Snowflake, Plaid, Webglow, and Netlify. “On October 30, 2026, we identified unauthorized access to an internal WorkOS application used by our sales team,” the company says in an incident alert.
Cryptocurrency exchange Binance says North Korean hackers used a fake job interview to trick an employee into installing malware that ultimately let them compromise the company's wallet infrastructure and steal about $6.34 billion in digital assets. This new information was shared in an incident report published today, which details how the attackers used social engineering, malicious software, and compromised internal systems to carry out the October 29 crypto theft. As previously reported by BleepingComputer, the FBI attributed the attack to North Korean state-sponsored hackers known as TraderTraitor, also tracked as Lazarus Group, Jade Sleet, and APT38. Binance says the attack began in September when a software engineer was contacted through a legitimate job-hunting platform by someone impersonating a Project Director at a fictitious company.
Large language model hijacking attacks, also known as LLMjacking, are generating large fraudulent cloud charges, with some organizations losing more than $100,000 per day. Companies can record costs as high as $1 million due to fraudulent calls using stolen API keys, researchers at Google's Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG) and Mandiant in analyzed incidents. Based on their observations, there are "two distinct operational clusters coordinating to compromise and monetize enterprise LLM infrastructure." The researchers identified two categories of threat actors: those who scan for publicly exposed LLM endpoints and those who steal valid API keys from unprotected machines. After gaining initial access, the attackers sell it to services known as LLM mixers, which provide their subscribers with unauthorized access to LLMs.
Gartner predicts that security operations centers will have 50% more engineers than analysts by 2028 as AI agents take over routine alert handling. Prophet Security examines how AI is reshaping SOC roles, from analyst responsibilities and detection engineering to threat hunting and exposure management.
European law enforcement authorities arrested seven suspects and seized more than 100 servers in a joint action targeting an unnamed company suspected of providing fraudulent trading websites to criminal gangs. Supported by Europol and Eurojust, this coordinated international action involved authorities from Albania, Cyprus, Finland, Germany, Kosovo, and North Macedonia and followed four years of investigation and earlier interventions in 2022 and 2025. The investigation began in 2022 after a German couple reported they couldn't withdraw money invested through an online trading platform, leading investigators to link multiple call center operators behind investment scams to potential victims in at least 50 countries. "The action follows four years of investigation and earlier interventions in 2022 and 2025. Evidence gathered during those operations led to the company allegedly operating the 'crime-as-a-service' model from Cyprus and Israel. Investigators also identified suspected clients operating fraudulent call centres in Albania, Kosovo* and North Macedonia," Europol said.
Google has expanded its Cloud Vulnerability Reward Program (VRP) with a new top-tier reward for high-impact architectural security flaws. Starting this month, researchers can earn $250,000 for Root-in-Cloud bugs, including tenant-isolation bypasses and complex cross-service logic flaws that let attackers gain full administrative control over arbitrary Google Cloud organizations. "To earn this premier reward, you must demonstrate full administrative control, the equivalent of 'roles/owner' or complete IAM control, over arbitrary Google Cloud organizations or projects with no prior access or special project setup," said Chris Betz, Google Cloud's Chief Information Security Officer (CISO). "Additionally, valid vulnerability reports demonstrating remote code execution (RCE) in underlying Google production infrastructure (Borg) or achieving root-in-prod will automatically be evaluated by the Google Cloud VRP panel for root-in-cloud eligibility."
Hackers who breached Harvard University's Alumni Affairs and Development systems in November 2025 stole data linked to more than 850,000 unique email addresses, according to breach notification service Have I Been Pwned. Harvard is a private Ivy League research university with over 20,000 faculty and staff, over 24,500 undergraduate and graduate students, and more than 400,000 alumni worldwide. As the university discovered on November 18, 2025, the attackers gained access to the personal information of students, alumni, donors, staff, and faculty members, including email addresses, telephone numbers, home and business addresses, event attendance records, donation details, and "biographical information pertaining to University fundraising and alumni engagement activities." However, Klara Jelinkova, Harvard's Vice President and University Chief Information Officer (CIO), said the breached IT systems didn't store Social Security numbers, passwords, payment card information, or financial information.
NIS2 Article 20 makes management bodies answerable for the access controls they approve, and boards are starting to ask for proof that those controls work. NIS2 board accountability gives directors a more direct role in cybersecurity. Under Article 20, the management bodies of essential and important entities must approve the cybersecurity risk-management measures required by the directive, oversee their implementation, and can be held liable for infringements, subject to national law. That obligation is live across most of the EU, with four member states going to the Court of Justice in July for failing to notify full transposition. Access control is one of the required measures. Directors are not expected to decide who gets administrator rights or review individual user accounts. They do, however, need to know that access is being controlled, that someone has responsibility for managing the risk, and that problems are being addressed. An estimated 160,000 entities fall within the scope of NIS2 across the EU. Approval is only part of the job Article 20 requires management bodies to both approve cybersecurity risk-management measures and oversee their implementation. It also requires the members of those bodies to undergo cybersecurity training, and to offer comparable training to employees on a regular basis. The measures themselves are set out in Article 21. They include access control policies and asset management, along with the use of multi-factor authentication or continuous authentication solutions where appropriate. Many organizations have traditionally left these decisions to security and IT teams. Under NIS2, the board still needs to know whether the measures it approved are being implemented. Day-to-day responsibility can remain with the CISO and IT teams. The difficulty comes when the person responsible for a risk does not control the budget, systems, or people needed to address it. Greece’s implementation goes further in defining who carries that responsibility. Its NIS2 law requires essential and important entities to appoint a suitably qualified member of their organization as an Information and Communication Systems Security Officer. The officer coordinates compliance, must have the resources needed to do the job, and operates independently of the company’s data protection officer. Access problems also need to reach the board in terms that it can act on. If an MFA rollout has failed or administrators have more access than they need, the board needs to understand the risk of leaving it unresolved. The CISO may be responsible for the risk without controlling the budget or teams needed to fix it. The board needs evidence Board reports often show what the access control policy requires, rather than whether it is being followed. For example, a company policy will likely require MFA and the removal of accounts when employees leave. However, the board also needs to know about the exceptions, including old accounts that remain active, excessive privileges, MFA exemptions that have never been reviewed, and suppliers whose access has outlasted their contracts. The board needs information about how the controls are working in practice. In a NIS2 access management report from European password and secrets manager Passwork, regulators from two national cybersecurity authorities and independent security leaders describe boards that have absorbed the liability change and now ask for proof that controls work, where they once accepted a summary of the policy. Organizations should be able to show who can access critical systems, why that access was granted, who approved it, how long it is valid, and when it was changed or revoked. The board needs to know whether that evidence exists and what it says about material access risk. Personal liability raises the stakes Implementation is still catching up in parts of Europe. In July 2026, the European Commission referred Ireland, Spain, France, and the Netherlands to the Court of Justice of the European Union for failing to notify full transposition of NIS2 into national law. The Commission also asked the Court to impose financial sanctions. For organizations in countries where NIS2 has been transposed, regulators have significant enforcement powers. For essential entities, member states must set a maximum fine of at least €10,000,000 or 2% of the global annual turnover, whichever is higher. Important entities are subject to a lower maximum threshold, of at least €7,000,000 or 1.4% of their global annual turnover, in a similar capacity. Article 32 also allows competent authorities, in specific circumstances, to seek the temporary prohibition of someone at CEO or legal representative level from exercising managerial functions in an essential entity. This can happen where enforcement action has failed to produce the required response. It is not an automatic consequence of a cyber incident. Article 20 separately requires member states to ensure that management bodies can be held liable for infringements of Article 21, subject to the applicable rules under national law. Approving the policy is not the end of the board’s involvement. It also needs information on whether the policy is being followed and what is happening with known problems. Verizon’s 2026 Data Breach Investigations Report found credential abuse somewhere in the chain of 39% of breaches, more than any other vector. Stolen credentials also circulate at scale, as the exposed database of 24 billion credential records reported in June showed. Directors should expect an answer on which accounts and credentials reach critical systems, who is responsible for them, and whether that access is being controlled. Give access risk an owner with authority CISOs briefing their boards should be able to say who owns access-control risk and whether that person has the authority to address it. The board also needs evidence of what is happening. When an access problem is identified, someone needs to be responsible for getting it fixed. That might mean removing unnecessary privileges or dealing with an MFA exception that has remained in place. If the fix depends on another team’s budget or resources, the board needs to know. Board reporting should show whether the controls it approved are working, flag significant exceptions that remain unresolved, and who is accountable for closing them. Author the author: Kirsten Doyle has spent 27 years writing about technology and has covered the industry through some of its most significant shifts. Her focus areas include cybersecurity, cloud, channel, enterprise IT, and data centre operations. She works across many formats: news, features, white papers, eBooks, and thought leadership. Kirsten has many years of experience in journalism and editing for both print and digital media, and has supported plenty of go-to-market and PR programmes with technically grounded writing that holds up to scrutiny. She is also a regular writer at Bora. Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon Pierluigi Paganini (SecurityAffairs – hacking, NIS2)
Apple warns German Bundestag lawmakers of mercenary spyware attacks; BSI urges victims to assume compromise. The German government is warning politicians and public figures that they were targeted by government-backed spyware. The warning follows Apple’s notifications, which began reaching iPhones on October 29, according to the federal cybersecurity office, the BSI. The BSI says members of the Bundestag and other notable people got an Apple alert about an attack with so-called mercenary spyware. “The Federal Office for Information Security ( BSI ) has learned that several members of the German Bundestag and other public figures have received a threat notification from Apple on their devices since October 29, 2026. In the notification, Apple states that it has detected an attack using so-called mercenary spyware . This is commercially developed, advanced spyware that has frequently been used in the past by state actors against specific, targeted individuals.” reads the notice issued by BSI. “The BSI (Federal Office for Information Security) is unaware whether these notifications indicate actual compromises or merely signal attempted attacks.y “ “Germany’s digital minister, Karsten Wildberger, has confirmed that members of the Bundestag and the federal government received warnings from Apple that their iPhones may have been targeted by spyware.” states the report. Digital minister Karsten Wildberger confirmed it on ARD’s Bericht aus Berlin on Sunday, saying there had been “a notification from Apple that certain devices may have been compromised” and that members of both the Bundestag and the federal government were among those warned. Digital minister said the BSI had reacted super quickly and written to everyone affected. Wildberger didn’t say how many politicians got the alerts or who they are. “According to Wildberger, the BSI advised those affected to assume – as a precaution – that their device may have been compromised, because the alerts do not show whether an attack succeeded.” states Euronews. The German government has not revealed who was targeted. Government spokesperson Stefan Kornelius told the Financial Times that officials are taking the incident and Apple’s warning very seriously. However, he did not say which government members received the alerts or whether Chancellor Friedrich Merz was among them. Apple has not commented on the reports, according to Euronews. The Apple warning does not provide all the answers. Apple does not identify the governments behind these attacks, nor does it confirm whether a device was actually infected. Germany’s cybersecurity agency, the BSI, also says it is unclear whether the alerts indicate successful infections or only attempted attacks. Apple says mercenary spyware is far more advanced than common cybercrime tools and that most users will never be targeted. This commercial surveillance software is often used on behalf of governments to spy on specific individuals. It can infect devices through so-called zero-click attacks, which do not require victims to open a message or click a link. In most cases, victims do not notice anything unusual. Once a phone is compromised, the BSI says, attackers can read messages, including in encrypted apps, and access calls, contacts, calendars and location. They can also turn on the camera and microphone. That’s the whole phone, not a corner of it. For recipients the BSI’s advice is concrete. Update the operating system immediately, unless you plan a forensic analysis, and consider turning on Lockdown Mode, which makes new attacks harder but doesn’t remove an existing infection. Lockdown Mode limits some features such as message attachments, link previews and FaceTime calls from unknown people, while calls and plain text messages keep working. If the risk looks high, the BSI suggests replacing the device. That means resetting every account used on it and, to make repeat attacks harder, changing the phone number. Then set a new device passcode, change the passwords of your Apple account and email, and make sure two-factor authentication is on. The BSI recommends turning on Signal’s registration lock and WhatsApp’s two-step verification, with a new PIN for each. It also advises removing any linked devices you don’t recognize. Anyone who received a warning can email the BSI Service Center at service-center@bsi.bund.de. This helps the agency work out how many people may be affected. The agency says a genuine Apple warning never asks you to click links, open files, install apps or profiles, or share passwords and codes. These warnings appear on the lock screen, in settings, by email and at the top of account.apple.com after you sign in. The warnings weren’t limited to Germany. Beirut-based filmmaker Radwan Mortada said on X that Apple had warned him about another attack against his device. He had already been targeted by spyware in 2021. أمس، تلقيتُ إشعاراً أمنياً من شركة Apple تحذّرني فيه من تعرّض هاتفي الآيفون لهجوم تجسّسي موجّه، باستخدام برمجيات متطوّرة من النوع الذي تطوّره شركات مثل NSO Group، المعروفة ببرنامج «بيغاسوس». ولعلّ أخطر ما ورد في التحذير تأكيد Apple أنّ هذا النوع من الهجمات يستهدف أشخاصاً محدّدين… pic.twitter.com/2jFq6F3cvD — رُضوان (@radwanmortada) October 30, 2026 According to his notice, Apple sent the latest warnings to users in 99 countries. Nobody has publicly identified the attackers or the government that may have ordered the attacks. The BSI warned German lawmakers that Apple threat notifications may indicate compromised devices and urged recipients to contact the agency and take protective measures. “Those affected who have received a corresponding warning message from Apple should therefore assume that their device may have been compromised.” BSI concludes. “In a letter dated October 30, 2026, the German Federal Office for Information Security (BSI) alerted members of the German Bundestag to the threat and informed them of necessary measures. Affected individuals were urged to contact the BSI directly .” Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon Pierluigi Paganini (SecurityAffairs – hacking, Bundestag)
Customers of the mSecure password manager are being urged to act now to protect the confidential information they store in it, possibly by changing passwords, resetting two-factor authentication (2FA), and removing passkeys. The warning came in an email sent on November 3 in the name of developer mSeven Software. It says the company recently learned of suspicious activity linked to the app but
Confirm this action.
Leaving now will discard your changes.