In a large-scale campaign that researchers dubbed CameraSwarm, hackers compromised more than 14,500 Dahua IP cameras mostly in Ukraine and Russia. The operation ran for at least 35 days between June 17 and July 22, compromising devices by exploiting vulnerabilities, brute-forcing logins, and using offline recovery codes from serial numbers for cloud-registered cameras. Researchers at threat intelligence company Hunt.io discovered the campaign after finding a working directory on an HTTP server that the operator left unprotected. Hunt.io recovered 407 MB of data comprising 2,616 files across 234 directories, including source code, logs, credentials, captured camera images, shell history, and exploitation results, which helped them map an impressive operation. According to their findings, the 35-day CameraSwarm campaign compromised 14,530 Dahua IP cameras using three attack methods in parallel:
An exposed operator directory reveals how one actor compromised 14,000+ Dahua cameras across Ukraine and Russia, no password needed for most. A researcher discovered an exposed directory containing the tools of an attacker who compromised more than 14,000 Dahua cameras between June 17 and July 22, 2026, mainly in Ukraine and Russia. Hunt.io reconstructed the operation, named Operation CameraSwarm, from the leaked files and telemetry. The find started with a mistake. On 23 July, Hunt.io’s AttackCapture system crawled a server at 154.86[.]119.60 and pulled down 2,616 files across 234 subdirectories, 407 MB in total, from an HTTP directory the operator had left wide open. That single slip handed researchers the operator’s scanning engine, exploit chains, exfiltration bot, and a Windows stealer staged on the same box. “This is the second Dahua-related camera compromise operation we’ve traced back to an exposed operator directory in as many weeks. Where last week’s investigation centered on a Russian-speaking operator running a purpose-built platform against 58 cameras, this one is a different scale entirely.” reads the report published by Hunt.io. The brute-force engine alone reached over 12,300 unique addresses. A separate authentication-bypass chain, built around two 2021 Dahua vulnerabilities, planted a persistent backdoor account on 1,923 cameras, an account stored independently of the admin password that survives both a password change and, on most firmware, a factory reset. A third path skipped IP addresses entirely and reached 283 cameras purely by serial number, through Dahua’s own cloud relay. That third path is the part worth sitting with. Most of those cameras were exposed online without authentication. Dahua’s cloud relay lets any app reach a camera sitting behind NAT using nothing but its serial number, and authentication to that relay runs on credentials baked identically into every Dahua client ever shipped. The operator’s own code logs the result of probing this channel at scale: 89.4 percent of live serials returned an open, no-authentication channel. Nine out of ten cameras, reachable by anyone who could guess or harvest a serial number. “The device never authenticates the connecting party. It authenticates the session, via a token the cloud issued before the device was contacted. Obtaining that token requires only the fixed SDK credentials shared by every legitimate Dahua application.” continues the report. “The only real barrier to reaching any camera through this path is knowing its serial number, precisely what the operator’s harvesting pipeline exists to produce at scale.” Getting from the tunnel session to full admin access still requires valid credentials or an authentication bypass. However, the attacker’s own logs suggest that most exposed cameras did not need this final step. There are also two important details about the reported CVEs. The tool links its persistent backdoor technique to CVE-2024-39943, but that CVE actually refers to a different command-injection flaw in Rejetto’s HTTP File Server. The technique is valid, but the CVE reference is wrong. Likewise, the relay abuse is not CVE-2025-31702, which Dahua describes as a narrower authenticated privilege-escalation flaw. Incorrect CVE references can send defenders looking for the wrong fix. Hunt.io also found something that had nothing to do with cameras: a UPX-packed Windows binary, tagged as SalatStealer, staged on the same server alongside a PowerShell script that disables Windows Defender five different ways, including a Group Policy key built to survive reboots and Defender updates. The researchers treat it as a separate, unrelated capability riding along on shared infrastructure, not part of the camera campaign proper. What stands out across the whole toolkit is that none of it was built from scratch. The brute-force engine, the bypass chain, the relay tooling, the recovery-code generator: each traces to a different public repository, credited (sometimes accurately) to at least six other developers. The operator assembled, patched, and rewrote, layering Russian comments over Spanish code in one component recovered in three separate stages of the same rewrite. “The same toolkit also recovers stored device passwords outright, through a routine that derives its decryption key entirely from values the attacker already holds, device class prefix and serial number, so no device secret is needed. A residual Spanish comment in that code confirms it came from the same upstream source as the original brute-forcer.” states the report.a The offline recovery-code generator is arguably the most consequential piece precisely because it doesn’t need a compromised device at all. Given a live serial number, it derives a code entirely offline that unlocks Dahua’s cloud-level account-recovery flow, no current credentials required. Removing a backdoor account doesn’t touch this. Only Dahua changing how the code is derived would. For anyone running Dahua gear, or the OEM-rebranded lines built on the same backend (Amcrest, Lorex, Annke, Swann, among others), the practical checklist is short: check for a p2pwn account and remove it, disable P2P on any device where it isn’t actually needed, confirm firmware is patched against the 2021 bypass pair, and rotate every credential that camera ever held, since the exfiltration bot grabbed those too. None of that fixes the recovery-code problem. That one sits with the vendor. Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon Pierluigi Paganini (SecurityAffairs – hacking, newsletter)
The U.S. has charged 17 Iranians, alleged members of a hacking-for-hire company called Mabna Institute, involved in years-long operations that stole data from American organizations. Nine of the defendants were previously charged in a March 2018 indictment for hacking more than 300 universities and private companies. The U.S. Justice Department (DoJ) has also announced rewards of up to $10 million for information leading to the location of five of the 17 Iranian defendants. According to the U.S. government, the newly charged eight individuals stole academic research, intellectual property, emails, and other proprietary information. The DoJ says that the Iranians listed below were involved in cyber operations for the Islamic Republic of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), other Iranian government bodies, universities, and paying customers.
Microsoft has resolved a bug that caused Windows Defender to crash after a recent security update, resulting in 0xc0000005 access violation errors on some affected systems. Microsoft Defender is a security software designed to provide real-time protection against malware, viruses, ransomware, and spyware on Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS devices. According to reports on social media and Microsoft's support site, users began seeing "Threat service has stopped. Restart it now" error messages on Windows 10 and Windows 11 devices starting Tuesday afternoon, prompting some affected customers to reinstall the operating system. "Beginning this morning, quick or full scans are failing, and will occasionally fail to the point where the Defender service needs to be restarted," one Windows system admin said.
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) warned that hackers are exploiting a critical-severity remote code execution (RCE) flaw in the Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions component. Also known as MS-IKEE, this is a set of additional capabilities Microsoft added to the IKE Protocol, including authentication via cryptographically generated addresses (CGAs), denial-of-service protection, and easier interoperability with non-Internet Protocol Security (IPsec)–capable peers. Tracked as CVE-2026-33824, this RCE vulnerability impacts all supported Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server releases, and it allows attackers without privileges to gain code execution by sending maliciously crafted packets to unpatched Windows systems through UDP ports 500 or 4500.
Microsoft tracked over 30 MacSync Stealer domains by focusing on behavioral patterns, revealing a campaign targeting passwords, keys, wallets and other data. Domain blocking is a losing game when the thing you’re blocking can register a new domain faster than you can add it to a list. That’s the exact problem Microsoft Defender Experts ran into while tracking MacSync Stealer, a macOS-focused information stealer that RST Cloud first flagged for swapping out its command-and-control infrastructure almost immediately after getting publicly outed. Microsoft detailed how its experts stopped chasing individual domains and started tracking the behaviors that stayed constant underneath them. Instead of tracking individual domains, Microsoft looked at recurring request patterns, HTTP headers and other behaviors. This allowed its researchers to link more than 30 domains to the same campaign and determine that the infrastructure was doing more than just sending commands to infected Macs. It was also being used to collect, stage and exfiltrate stolen data. “MacSync Stealer is a macOS-focused information stealer that relies on changing infrastructure to deliver payloads, communicate with compromised devices, and exfiltrate data. Earlier reporting by RST Cloud identified the threat through a limited set of domains and documented rapid command-and-control (C2) replacement after public disclosure.” reads the report published by Microsoft. “Microsoft Defender Experts expanded that view by correlating recurring endpoints and network behaviors across the activity. This behavior-led approach connected more than 30 domains and showed that the infrastructure supported more than C2 communication, extending into active collection, staging, and exfiltration.” The infection chain starts with a trick rather than an exploit. Victims get social-engineered through a technique known as ClickFix, tricked into pasting or running commands directly in macOS Terminal, and once that shell session fires, curl pulls down attacker-controlled payload content from a path formatted as /curl/[token]. Then, native macOS tools decode and unpack the payload, and an AppleScript-driven layer takes over, blending Unix commands like sh, cp, rm, and killall with osascript calls that make the whole chain look more like ordinary system scripting than malware. Once active, the stealer focuses on valuable data. The malicious code looks for macOS Keychain data, saved browser passwords and cookies, SSH keys, AWS credentials, Kubernetes configurations and files in common user folders. It also searches for Ledger and Trezor wallet data, showing that the malware targets users with valuable credentials and assets rather than simply collecting random browser history. What actually confirms exfiltration, rather than just suspicious traffic, is the upload mechanism itself. Collected data gets staged under temporary paths, compressed into an archive, split into chunks, and pushed out through HTTP PUT requests carrying parameters like upload_id, chunk_index, and total_chunks. “The staged archive was uploaded through rotating infrastructure using curl and HTTP PUT requests. Observed requests included –data-binary, API-key headers, macOS User-Agent string, upload_id values, chunk_index values, and total_chunks parameters.” states Microsoft. “These upload traits confirmed active data exfiltration and provided durable hunting pivots even when domains rotated. “ The researchers pointed out that the exfiltration method stays recognizable even when the destination keeps changing. RST Cloud’s follow-up work backs up how consistent this infrastructure actually is under the surface. Using the same recurring URI patterns, RST Cloud surfaced eleven additional candidate domains and found a static API-key value shared across four confirmed command-and-control domains, even while the build token attached to each deployment kept rotating. A shared static key sitting inside otherwise rotating infrastructure is exactly the kind of detail that makes automated evasion look less impressive up close. The attack wraps up with cleanup, deleting temporary archives, staging folders, and lock files after the upload completes. Microsoft notes this reduces what’s left sitting on disk, but it doesn’t erase the behavioral sequence itself. “After exfiltration, the malware removed temporary archives, staging folders, lock files, and other artifacts. Although this cleanup reduced on-disk evidence, the sequence of archive creation, chunked upload, and deletion can still provide a useful behavioral correlation for defenders.” concludes Microsoft. For anyone defending Mac fleets, the practical takeaway here isn’t a list of domains to block, since that list will be stale within days. It’s building detection around the recurring shape of the attack itself: shell sessions spawning curl with those specific flag patterns, osascript chaining rapidly into network activity, and archives appearing under /tmp/sync* right before outbound PUT traffic starts. Chase the pattern, not the address, because the address was never going to sit still long enough to matter. Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon Pierluigi Paganini (SecurityAffairs – hacking, malware)
Over 50,000 exposed Stripe API keys show how leaked secrets can enable fraud, data access and account abuse within hours. Ransomnews researchers have documented a large-scale leak of Stripe merchant API keys found exposed in public code repositories, GitHub Actions logs, and misconfigured web servers, with over 50,000 unique keys identified in total. The research is practical rather than theoretical: the team tested a sample of the keys, found a meaningful portion still active, and documented exactly how quickly a fraudster could exploit them. The answer is fast. “A dataset published on a data-trading forum on 18 August 2026 contains live Stripe API keys for 659 merchant accounts, along with roughly 35 GB of customer and payment data pulled from them.” reads the report published by Ransomnews. “Ransomnews analysed the files offline and reported the exposure to Stripe before publishing. Stripe itself was not compromised. The keys belong to merchants.” Researchers said that after finding an active Stripe API key, they were able to access a merchant’s customer list, create a fraudulent payment link and make a $1 test charge within 17 hours. The key alone was enough to perform these actions, highlighting the risks of exposed credentials and insufficient API protections. The operations a live Stripe secret key unlocks are extensive: listing customers and their stored payment methods, creating charges and payment intents, issuing refunds to attacker-controlled accounts, modifying webhook endpoints to intercept future payment notifications, and in some cases accessing connected accounts if the merchant had enabled Stripe Connect. A secret key is not a partial credential. It’s full API access. The sources of the leaked keys are unsurprising to anyone who has done developer security work. GitHub repositories — both public and accidentally made public, account for the largest share, typically through hardcoded keys in configuration files, .env files committed without a corresponding .gitignore entry, or keys left in code comments. GitHub Actions build logs are the second major source: when a workflow prints environment variables for debugging, any secret that wasn’t properly masked ends up in a log that anyone with repository access can read. Misconfigured web servers are another major source of exposed Stripe API keys. Researchers found over 3,000 servers revealing Stripe-related strings, with about 12% containing keys that worked against the Stripe API. The source of the 659 exposed merchant keys is unclear, but likely includes infostealer logs, public repositories, exposed environment files and misconfigured backups. The collector’s real advantage was systematically validating the keys, accessing each account and organizing the stolen data. “The dataset doesn’t say, and we are not going to guess at a single source for 659 separate merchants. The realistic candidates are the ordinary ones: secret keys sitting in infostealer logs lifted from developer machines, keys committed to public repositories, keys left in exposed environment files, keys pulled out of misconfigured backups. Stripe’s own documentation says the company scans for exactly this, and describes finding merchant keys on repositories and package registries.” concludes the report. “What the collector added was patience. Gathering keys is common. Validating several hundred of them, then systematically walking the API for each account and archiving the results into a consistent folder structure, is a different level of effort.” Stripe does provide automatic secret scanning through GitHub’s partner program, which flags Stripe keys found in public repositories and can trigger automatic revocation when a merchant opts in. The problem is that opt-in rate is low, the scanning doesn’t cover private repositories, and it has no coverage over build logs, web server misconfigurations, or other platforms where keys surface. Ransomnews also found that some merchants had rotated their keys after a GitHub exposure but left the old keys active, possibly because Stripe doesn’t revoke keys on rotation unless you explicitly delete the old one. The remediation is not complicated. Audit your current Stripe keys against your version control history to see if any have ever been committed. Rotate any key that has touched a public repository, a build log, or a configuration file that wasn’t explicitly protected. Enable Stripe’s restricted keys for any integration that doesn’t need full account access — a webhook handler doesn’t need the ability to create charges. And enable Stripe Radar rules to flag unusual charge patterns that might indicate someone else is using your key before you’ve noticed it’s gone. Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon Pierluigi Paganini (SecurityAffairs – hacking, data leak)
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) said Tuesday that the Medusa ransomware gang has breached more than 500 critical infrastructure organizations in the United States since June 2021. This was revealed in a joint advisory in coordination with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). "As of April 2026, Medusa actors have impacted more than 500 victims across multiple critical infrastructure sectors, including Healthcare and Public Health, Defense Industrial Base, Critical Manufacturing, Government Services and Facilities, Information Technology, and Financial Services," they said. "Other victims include organizations in the medical, education, legal, insurance, technology, and manufacturing industries." This is an update to a joint report published in March 2025, which said the Medusa ransomware operation had impacted an estimated over 300 critical infrastructure organizations.
U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) adds Apple macOS, Microsoft SharePoint, Broadcom VMware vCenter, and Microsoft IKE flaws to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added the following vulnerabilities to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog: CVE-2026-33824 (CVSS score: 9.8) – Microsoft Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Double Free Vulnerability CVE-2026-55040 (CVSS score: 9.1) Microsoft SharePoint Weak Authentication Vulnerability CVE-2026-59310 (CVSS score: 9.8) Broadcom VMware vCenter Path Traversal Vulnerability CVE-2026-65400 Apple macOS Improper Authentication Vulnerability CVE-2026-33824 is a Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Service Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This critical flaw in Windows IKE service extensions could allow remote attackers to execute code on affected systems. Systems with IKE enabled are at risk, though blocking UDP ports 500 and 4500 can reduce exposure from external threats. However, internal attackers may still exploit it for lateral movement, so rapid patching is strongly recommended. CVE-2026-55040 is a critical SharePoint authentication bypass. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit weaknesses in JWT validation to forge tokens and impersonate any SharePoint user, including administrators. “A critical authentication bypass vulnerability exists in SharePoint Server Subscription Edition’s JWT token validation pipeline. The root cause is a chain of four distinct weaknesses that, when combined, allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to forge a valid JWT and impersonate any SharePoint site user.” wrote Rapid7. The exploit chain works by sending a JWT with “alg: none” in the outer header so no signature is required, using SharePoint’s own STS certificate thumbprint to resolve a signing key without verification, and then passing a non-empty but never-verified signature like “AAAA.” The result is a fully forged token that SharePoint accepts as legitimate. Defused researchers observed attackers using the Rapid7 POC for CVE-2026-55040 against our SharePoint their honeypots. CVE-2026-59310 flaw is a Path Traversal Vulnerability that allows an attacker with network access to execute arbitrary code. “VMware vCenter contains a directory traversal vulnerability in the Syslog server. Broadcom has evaluated the severity of this issue to be in the Critical severity range with a maximum CVSSv3 base score of 9.8.”states the advisory.”A malicious actor with network access to vCenter may exploit this issue to execute arbitrary code.” CVE-2026-65400 is an Improper Authentication Vulnerability that sits in macOS’s built-in Screen Sharing feature, the remote desktop tool baked into every Mac.On August 15, 2026, the Dutch National Cyber Security Centre confirmed active exploitation of a critical macOS authentication flaw, less than two weeks after Apple shipped the fix. Apple’s fix improved how the system manages authentication state, closing a gap that let attackers on the network authenticate to Screen Sharing without valid credentials at all. Apple patched this issue with the release of macOS Tahoe 26.6.1, macOS Sequoia 15.7.9, and macOS Sonoma 14.8.9, crediting researcher Alfredo Pesoli (@__rev) at Bynario Atlas (bynar.io) for the discovery. “An attacker on the network may be able to authenticate to Screen Sharing without valid credentials” reads the advisory. According to Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01: Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities, FCEB agencies have to address the identified vulnerabilities by the due date to protect their networks against attacks exploiting the flaws in the catalog. Experts also recommend that private organizations review the Catalog and address the vulnerabilities in their infrastructure. CISA orders federal agencies to fix the flaws by August 21, 2026 Follow me on Twitter: @securityaffairs and Facebook and Mastodon Pierluigi Paganini (SecurityAffairs – hacking, CISA)
A previously unreported cyber espionage operation dubbed SilkParasite has been observed targeting government bodies in Central Asia. The intrusion set makes use of seven remote access tool (RAT) families, five of which have never been previously documented: DriveSilkRAT, CookiETagRAT, NomadRAT, GoginRAT, and NodeEdgeRAT. SilkParasite, first discovered in late 2025, is assessed to be a
Confirm this action.
Leaving now will discard your changes.